Skip to content

The TOM 100: Solutions Providers

The 100 Solutions Providers brands buyers and AI notice first. Index data updated 2026.

Rank Brand Top of Mind Top of Model Composite Score
1 Microsoft 40.3 80.0 60.2
2 Accenture 48.0 60.0 54.0
3 Amazon 25.4 75.0 50.2
4 CDW 32.1 68.3 50.2
5 IBM 39.7 60.0 49.9
6 Insight 32.4 63.3 47.9
7 SHI 26.6 68.3 47.5
8 Cisco 26.1 68.3 47.2
9 WWT 15.1 78.3 46.7
10 Gartner 1.7 91.7 46.7
11 Red Hat 9.4 83.3 46.4
12 Deloitte 33.7 58.3 46.0
13 Flexera 16.9 75.0 46.0
14 ServiceNow 18.4 73.3 45.9
15 Capgemini 29.2 61.7 45.4
16 Equinix 6.8 83.3 45.1
17 NVIDIA 10.6 78.3 44.5
18 NIST 1.0 86.7 43.8
19 Salesforce 17.8 68.3 43.1
20 Fortinet 6.2 80.0 43.1
21 Infosys 29.4 56.7 43.0
22 Nutanix 10.0 75.0 42.5
23 HPE 16.1 68.3 42.2
24 McKinsey 13.9 68.3 41.1
25 Dell 17.2 65.0 41.1
26 CyberArk 0.5 81.7 41.1
27 Palo Alto 7.1 75.0 41.0
28 Jamf 1.7 80.0 40.9
29 VMware 19.9 61.7 40.8
30 Google 21.5 60.0 40.8
31 Pure 2.0 78.3 40.1
32 Zscaler 5.1 75.0 40.0
33 Kyndryl 19.5 60.0 39.7
34 Slack 4.1 75.0 39.5
35 Avanade 5.0 73.3 39.2
36 Oracle 11.6 66.7 39.1
37 Jabra 1.1 76.7 38.9
38 Arista 0.6 76.7 38.7
39 IGEL 0.6 76.7 38.7
40 CrowdStrike 5.6 71.7 38.6
41 NTT 15.2 61.7 38.4
42 Computacenter 8.5 68.3 38.4
43 NetApp 3.4 73.3 38.4
44 Adobe 1.7 75.0 38.3
45 Illumio 3.3 73.3 38.3
46 Digital Realty 4.8 71.7 38.2
47 Lenovo 6.1 70.0 38.1
48 CISA 1.1 75.0 38.0
49 Zoom 9.0 66.7 37.8
50 Harvard Business School 0.6 75.0 37.8
51 S&P Global 0.5 75.0 37.8
52 Datadog 0.4 75.0 37.7
53 Logitech 2.0 73.3 37.7
54 Workday 1.6 73.3 37.5
55 Snow 9.9 65.0 37.5
56 Carahsoft 8.3 66.7 37.5
57 Okta 4.8 70.0 37.4
58 Snowflake 1.5 73.3 37.4
59 HCLTech 19.6 55.0 37.3
60 PwC 11.3 63.3 37.3
61 BCG 5.8 68.3 37.1
62 SailPoint 0.8 73.3 37.0
63 Iron Mountain 5.7 68.3 37.0
64 ePlus 7.4 66.7 37.0
65 Cloudflare 0.6 73.3 37.0
66 SADA 0.4 73.3 36.9
67 AMD 1.8 71.7 36.7
68 DocuSign 1.3 71.7 36.5
69 Schneider Electric 1.1 71.7 36.4
70 Infoblox 1.0 71.7 36.3
71 Manhattan Associates 1.0 71.7 36.3
72 FinOps Foundation 2.5 70.0 36.2
73 AHEAD 5.7 66.7 36.2
74 Claroty 0.6 71.7 36.1
75 TCS 20.4 51.7 36.1
76 Extron 0.4 71.7 36.1
77 Softcat 3.7 68.3 36.0
78 Akamai 0.3 71.7 36.0
79 PagerDuty 0.3 71.7 36.0
80 Juniper 1.9 70.0 36.0
81 Slalom 6.9 65.0 35.9
82 Tanium 1.8 70.0 35.9
83 SAS 1.5 70.0 35.7
84 PTC 1.4 70.0 35.7
85 Options Technology 1.3 70.0 35.7
86 CoreSite 2.8 68.3 35.6
87 Mission Cloud 7.7 63.3 35.5
88 Presidio 14.3 56.7 35.5
89 SAP 2.6 68.3 35.5
90 Splunk 0.9 70.0 35.4
91 Cognizant 22.5 48.3 35.4
92 Booz Allen Hamilton 5.7 65.0 35.4
93 Esri 0.6 70.0 35.3
94 Wiz 0.5 70.0 35.3
95 Databricks 0.4 70.0 35.2
96 NetSuite 0.4 70.0 35.2
97 Terraform 0.4 70.0 35.2
98 Vertiv 0.4 70.0 35.2
99 Nozomi Networks 0.4 70.0 35.2
100 Info-Tech Research Group 0.3 70.0 35.2

The TOM 100 shows the rankings.

Your free Snapshot shows the why.

Get your brand's full 8-signal breakdown behind both scores and the same breakdown for your category's top 3, so you can see exactly where the leaders are winning. Free, even if you're not in the TOM 100.

TOM_Index_

Solutions Providers category definition

The TOM Index defines Solutions Providers as brands that deliver multi-vendor technology solutions: integrators, resellers, distributors, managed service providers, and consultancies that assemble products, services, and expertise from multiple sources into a single outcome for the buyer.

We score brands here on how clearly they are discovered and trusted as the partner who designs, assembles, and delivers the solution, distinct from the manufacturers whose products they carry. This is a delivery and advisory identity, so a brand is scored here when its primary value is integration, guidance, and delivery rather than a single owned product line.

Category reality

In the Solutions Providers category, visibility is shaped by trust, role specificity, and proof of operational delivery. Buyers are not choosing a product, they are choosing a partner to bet their implementation on.

The market is crowded with brands carrying similar OEM badges, similar capability claims, and the same "we do it all" positioning. Buying committees, spanning IT leadership, procurement, finance, and increasingly line-of-business stakeholders, use fast, imprecise heuristics to build their shortlists. They ask: Who feels safe? Who has done this before? Who will not surprise me at go-live?

Brands that cannot answer those questions clearly in early research, whether through AI-mediated discovery, peer references, or digital presence, are filtered out before a single sales conversation begins.

How your brand gets evaluated

Buying committees and AI systems are both forming opinions about your brand before sales is ever involved. Here's what's shaping those impressions:

icon-check-circle-black-1

Subcategory Placement: Can AI and buyers quickly identify what kind of partner you actually are? Integrator, reseller, managed services. Ambiguity here causes omission, not evaluation.

icon-check-circle-black-1

Persona Recognition: Do the right stakeholders, CIO, IT, procurement, security, line-of-business, find themselves in your story? Or does your message talk to everyone and land with no one?

icon-check-circle-black-1

Shortlist Surfacing: When AI summarizes top technology solutions providers in a buying context, are you named as a distinct option, or collapsed into other regional partners?

icon-check-circle-black-1

Side-by-Side Evaluation: When a buying committee compares you against category leaders, does your story hold up on your terms?

icon-check-circle-black-1

Leadership Visibility: Are your leaders visible as operators and advisors, people who have solved this before, or only as salespeople?

icon-check-circle-black-1

Narrative Consistency: Is your brand story distinct, consistent, and easy to repeat, or does it shift by practice, by region, by rep?

icon-check-circle-black-1

Proof That Travels: Can a buyer remember and repeat what makes you different after the meeting ends? Can a procurement lead defend the choice internally?

icon-check-circle-black-1

Emotional Trust: Do you feel like a low-risk choice, or like a vendor that requires internal justification?

Perspectives shaping what's next